Woman and Her Wishes - 1853 |
|
|
An 1853
Argument for Women's Rights, by Thomas Wentworth Higginson: What Do Women Want? Editor's introduction: Higginson acknowledges the three Woman's Rights Conventions held in the five years just before he is writing this essay, and the specious arguments he finds that are used against the "rebellious females" by editors, ministers and professors. He points out that similar arguments have been used against slavery and in defense of oligarchy before. He addresses the first of these arguments: that women don't want equal rights. |
|
|
It is not to be denied, that the subject is coming rapidly into discussion, and bids fair to be ably handled. On the one side are the reports of three large and estimable "Woman's Rights Conventions," in Worcester and Syracuse, together with a series of ten tracts, by the same indefatigable band of agitators. On the other side are the fixed observances of Church and State; nearly every stripling editor in the land has winged his goosequill in defence of established institutions; reverend divines have quoted Scripture, and grave professors quoted Aristophanes; and nothing has been left undone, except to reprint old John Knox's tract of A. D. 1553, entitled, "Blast of a Trumpet against the Monstrous Regiment of Women." It is an unfortunate thing for this last party, that every one of their arguments is vitiated by the fact, that it has been used heretofore in defence of every oligarchy and every slavery. The rebellious females are assured, first, that they do not really wish for any farther political rights; second, that they do not need them; third, that they are not fit for them. To which the fair malcontents reply --like malcontents in all ages, fair or foul -- first, that they know what they wish; second, that they know what they need; third, that they know what they are fit for, and intend to secure it. I. Upon the first point, I can only here say, that men have, as men, nothing to do with it. This essay is entitled "Woman and her Wishes," because I conceive that to be, for men, the main point at issue. The final choice must be made by women themselves. The final question must be, What does woman, after all, desire? It may be still as difficult to ascertain this as in the days of the wandering knight, in the old English legend; but it is essential. I do not understand, however, that any man is called upon to settle this question. We are not to interfere, except to secure fair play. I have not heard that the most ardent apostles have proposed to compel any woman to make stump-speeches against her will; or march a fainting sisterhood to the polls, under a police in Bloomer costume. Let there only be fair play. The highest demand of each; that is her destiny. "Let them be sea-captains if they will," and that is all. Next page > Do Women Need Civil Rights? > Summary, Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17From: "Woman and Her Wishes" by Thomas Wentworth Higginson, 1853. This etext has been edited by Jone Johnson Lewis from a pamphlet published around 1853. The titles of the sections are my own, not in the original, and are included to make it easier to follow Higginson's argument. Part of a collection of etexts on women's history produced by Jone Johnson Lewis. Editing and formatting © 1999-2013 Jone Johnson Lewis. | |

